Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter

The Costco Tequila Lawsuit: A Complete Breakdown for Arkansas Consumers

Share your love

A Deep Dive Into the Allegations, Tequila Labeling Laws, Additive Rules, CRT Authority, and Why Costco Is Not the Real Issue

Important Note: ArkansasLiquor.com has no affiliation or connection with Costco. I simply shop the Little Rock Costco liquor store frequently because of their pricing. This article is an independent industry analysis.


1. The Lawsuit Against Costco’s Kirkland Tequila — What Is Being Alleged?

In late 2025, a class-action lawsuit was filed accusing Costco of mislabeling its Kirkland Signature tequila as “100% Blue Weber Agave.” The plaintiffs argue:


Allegation #1 — The Tequila Contains Non-Agave Ethanol

Plaintiffs claim that independent laboratory testing — using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and isotope ratio analysis — indicates the presence of:

  • Cane-derived ethanol, or
  • Other non-agave sugars,

suggesting the tequila may not meet the Mexican regulatory definition of 100% agave tequila.

These are the same tests used in:

  • The Casamigos lawsuit
  • The Don Julio lawsuit
  • The Cincoro lawsuit
  • The general wave of “tequila purity” lawsuits affecting the industry

These lawsuits all repeat nearly identical claims and cite similar lab methodologies.


Allegation #2 — Costco Misled Consumers Into Paying Premium Prices

By labeling the bottle as “100% Blue Weber Agave,” plaintiffs argue Costco:

  • Positioned the tequila as premium
  • Allowed consumers to believe the product was free of non-agave sugars
  • Benefited financially from perceived agave purity

Worth noting:
The lawsuit does not allege any health or safety issue, only labeling and purity representation.


Allegation #3 — Costco Should Have Known Better

The plaintiffs claim Costco “knew or should have known” the tequila wasn’t 100% agave because of:

  • Its industry relationships
  • Market position
  • Purchasing power
  • Contracted private-label agreements

This is speculative and unproven.


Reality Check: The Case Is Unresolved

There has been:

  • No settlement
  • No judgment
  • No class certification

The lawsuit is ongoing, and the claims remain unproven.


2. The Tequila Labeling System: CRT Controls Everything

Most consumers don’t know this:
Costco does NOT write the production-related parts of its tequila label.
Mexico does.

Tequila labeling is governed by:

NOM-006-SCFI-2012

Mexico’s official tequila standard.

And enforced by:

CRT — Consejo Regulador del Tequila

Mexico’s federal tequila regulator.

This governing system controls:

  • What can appear on a label
  • What MUST appear
  • What can NEVER appear
  • How sugar sources are classified
  • Whether “100% de agave” is legally approved
  • Whether a tequila can be exported at all

How Label Approval Works:

Step 1 — The Distillery Submits Label & Formula to the CRT

The producer provides the CRT with:

  • Production logs
  • Sugar-source documentation
  • Distillation records
  • Additive declarations
  • Batch chemistry
  • Proof and aging documentation

Step 2 — The CRT Reviews and Certifies the Label

If the CRT determines the tequila qualifies as “100% agave,” they require this phrase to appear.

Step 3 — Approval Stamp + NOM Number

The CRT certifies the tequila with a NOM number and approves the final label.

Step 4 — U.S. Retailers MUST Sell the Bottle Exactly As Certified

Costco cannot alter:

  • “100% Blue Weber Agave”
  • NOM number
  • Additive disclosures (or lack thereof)
  • Production method information
  • CRT-certified statements

If Costco changes one single production-related phrase, it voids export legality under Mexican law.


3. What Tequila Distilleries Are Allowed To Add – Even in “100% Agave” Tequila

This is the part almost no consumer understands:

“100% agave” does NOT mean absolutely nothing added.

Under NOM-006, distilleries may legally add up to:

1% TOTAL ADDITIVES

(included by volume) without losing their “100% agave” classification.

Legal additives include:

  • Caramel coloring
  • Natural flavor extracts
  • Oak extract
  • Glycerin
  • Sugar-based flavor compounds

These are used to:

  • Adjust color
  • Smooth mouthfeel
  • Add sweetness
  • Normalize batch variations
  • Create consistency year-over-year

And these additives do NOT have to appear on the label.

Consumers often assume transparency where the law does not require it.


The Additive-Free Controversy

Distilleries that wanted transparency partnered with:

  • Tequila Matchmaker
  • Additive-Free Alliance

Together, these groups verified:

  • Zero flavorings
  • Zero sweeteners
  • Zero glycerin
  • Zero oak extract
  • Zero undisclosed additives

But then:

The CRT forced these programs to shut down (2023–2024)

The regulator did the following:

❌ Prohibited the use of “Additive-Free”
❌ Ordered removal of additive-free lists
❌ Threatened distilleries with sanctions for participating
❌ Suspended Patrón exports over additive-free marketing
❌ Categorically banned additive-free marketing claims

This created total transparency loss.

The CRT’s decision directly impacts the Costco case — Costco is legally forbidden from voluntarily stating “additive-free” even if true.


4. What Costco Can Control vs. What Costco Can NOT Control

Costco Controls:

  • Brand name (“Kirkland Signature”)
  • Bottle shape, cork, label style
  • Packaging quality
  • Case quantity
  • Retail pricing
  • Distribution within Arkansas and nationally

And yes — in Arkansas, Costco sells liquor at or below MSRP compared to many local stores. Evidence is anecdotal but consistent across consumer observations.


Costco Does NOT Control:

  • Whether the tequila qualifies as “100% agave”
    ✔ CRT controls
  • Whether additives were used
    ✔ CRT controls
  • Whether sugar sources meet purity standards
    ✔ Distillery + CRT control
  • Whether the tequila is allowed to be exported
    ✔ CRT controls
  • What production claims appear on the label
    ✔ CRT controls
  • Whether “additive-free” can be mentioned
    ✔ CRT forbids it

Costco is essentially a retailer, not a producer or certifying authority.


5. Why Costco Has Very Little to Do with the Core Issue

When you examine the case carefully, Costco is only involved because:

A) They sold a product with a CRT-approved label

They are legally obligated to accept the label.

B) They did not distill the tequila

They have no access to internal fermentation logs, additive logs, or agave sugar documentation.

C) They cannot legally alter CRT-approved production claims

If they remove “100% Blue Weber Agave,” they cannot legally import it.

D) The CRT restricts transparency

Costco cannot claim “no additives,” even if true.

E) Costco is a downstream actor

Every tequila retailer in Arkansas is in the exact same legal position.

Costco’s role is passive:

  • They selected a reputable distillery.
  • They used the regulator-approved label.
  • They sold the tequila at a competitive price.

6. Other Major Brands Facing the Same “Purity” Allegations

Costco is not alone — dozens of brands face similar (or identical) allegations:


Casamigos (George Clooney’s former brand)

  • Sued for allegedly using non-agave ethanol
  • Uses the same isotope testing methodology
  • Case is ongoing
  • Same allegations as Costco

Don Julio (Diageo)

  • Included in Casamigos-class lawsuits
  • Targeted over “100% agave” claim integrity

Cincoro (Michael Jordan & Celebrities)

  • Sued for misrepresenting 100% agave status
  • Uses identical scientific allegations

Clase Azul

  • Frequently accused of additive usage (legal under NOM)
  • Not sued but heavily scrutinized

818 Tequila (Kendall Jenner)

  • Faced lawsuits over trademark, but also criticized heavily in additive discussions

Patrón

  • Had exports suspended over additive-free marketing (not purity, but regulatory conflict)

What all these cases share:

They are not about retailers.
They are about:

  • CRT authority
  • NOM allowances
  • Additive opacity
  • Distillery self-reporting
  • Consumer misunderstanding of “100% agave”
  • Scientific testing disputes

Costco is simply the biggest target because:

  • It sells at low prices
  • It moves high volume
  • It has only one Arkansas store, making it highly visible locally

7. Arkansas Context

Costco has one location in Arkansas — the Little Rock warehouse at:

16901 Chenal Pkwy, Little Rock, AR 72223

This means:

  • The Kirkland tequila at issue is sold in only one Arkansas county
  • Pricing is generally below or at MSRP for most spirits
  • Costco’s strong pricing likely intensifies local scrutiny
  • Many consumers buy it because the value is unmatched in the state

As an Arkansas-based reviewer:

ArkansasLiquor.com is not affiliated with Costco in any way,
but I shop there for liquor due to their excellent pricing compared to other local retailers.



8. Final Thoughts — This Is a Regulatory Problem, Not a Costco Problem

The truth is simple:

  • Costco does not distill tequila
  • Costco does not certify agave purity
  • Costco does not approve labels
  • Mexico prohibits additive-free disclosure
  • CRT controls every production claim
  • Additives are legal in 100% agave tequila
  • Dozens of brands face identical lawsuits

Costco is simply the first big-box retailer pulled into a system-wide transparency problem rooted in:

  • Mexican regulatory structure
  • Distillery practices
  • Legal additive allowances
  • CRT’s aggressive policing of transparency
  • Consumer misunderstanding of “100% agave”

For Arkansas drinkers:
Despite the lawsuit, Costco’s Kirkland tequilas remain popular because they offer genuine value in Little Rock. But the larger industry conversation — purity, additives, transparency — is far from over.


Share your love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay informed and not overwhelmed, subscribe now!